缺乏研究、評估與正確方法的護魚活動，在村民的熱情下還是有一定的成果，但長期封溪的後果，遭到喜愛釣魚活動者，以及部分村民反對，因此研議開放。The villagers carried out the conservation program with the their own passion. Even the conservation program lacks of serious scientific research and planning, Shrding stream conservation still has some result after been protected for a long time. However, the stream conservation was forced to open due to the objection from some of villagers and anglers.
然而就如同封溪，開放也一樣缺乏正確的方法與管制，以致於五天的開放，換來的是溪魚的「瘋狂大屠殺」，並帶來了大量的垃圾！最後只得在倉皇的決定下，草草結束開放垂釣的活動，但又要封到何時呢？又何時才有完備的垂釣規定與執行者呢？ Just the same as the administration of conservation program, locals decided to open conservation without further planning and management. Such wrong decision resulted some poor fishers littered trash and carried game over the limitation. Finally, villagers were forced to close fishing zone in a hurry. There are only five days from opening to close. However, when does the stream open? And when will the authority establish proper fishing regulations? I have no idea.
感覺起來努力作了五年的保育溪流研究好像「神經病」！期望藉由研究國外垂釣規定、釣魚區規劃，作為台灣未來在保育、經濟與戶外活動三者間，能取得一個平衡，但那個中央或地方政客會信？嗤！
I have spent five years on researching in river conservation, however, all my effort seen to be wasted. I expected that we could find a balance with conservation, economic and outdoor activity by studying the fishing regulations and C&R zone planning which applied in the foreign. But, will the politicians believe such ideas? I don't believe they would understand.
No comments:
Post a Comment